|
Close window to return to previous page. |
|
||||
|
Institute/Session
Summary: This presentation will show how the presenters designed and implemented a hybrid course that combined a composition course with a first-year seminar for developmental students. The presenters will detail the positives and negatives of such a combination. The purpose is for the intended audience of both new and experienced developmental educators to get an idea of some ways such a course could work at their institution. First, the presenters will review the research on this issue, explaining how such research became the cornerstone—-and the selling point—-for the combined course. Second, the presenters will examine the political forces on campus that worked both for and against such a combination. In spite of their demonstrated effectiveness, first-year seminars can generate a great deal of resistance on many campuses. Opponents will often level the accusation that such courses water down the curriculum. The presenters will detail how they faced such opposition, how they addressed it, and how the combination course was ultimately a useful tool in defusing it. Finally, the presenters will examine an actual course offered with such a combination. The examination of the course will focus on the design, materials used (including numerous handouts to attendees), and student feedback in the form of both qualitative and quantitative survey results. The presenters will invite feedback from the attendees as well. The last part of the presentation will involve an open discussion with attendees which will actively invite their participation so that other ideas on this topic can be shared with both the presenters and with the audience as a whole. The presenters will reserve at least ten minutes so audience members have sufficient time to participate. Audience members will be provided handouts throughout the presentation and will be encouraged to share thoughts or ask questions at any time. Learning Outcomes: The presenters intend for audience members to have the following learning outcomes from this presentation:
Presenter1
Name: Thomas Stewart Presenter2
Name: Mary Stewart |
|||||
|
|||||