|
Technology rich (new/not antiquated)
Excellent guidelines for replacement
TCT credibility
College has innovators &
leaders
Many training opportunities
IRTS/college-wide tech support
much improved
Planning & budgeting loop
Student access
Campus web presence improved
(& campus support for web pages)
Funding available-well spent
|
Insufficient classroom technology
for existing classrooms
Teacher stations will be difficult
to upgrade in future (all old at same time)
Campus-wide assessment not in
place for effect of technology on learning
No clear strategy for college-wide
mix of delivery alternatives
Lack of visible incentives for
innovating with technology to improve learning
Low pay for tech positions
Aging & outdated network
infrastructure in our dynamic world
Lack of help desk for students for New Student
System, Blackboard, Midas
|
New SIS System
Assessment
Dropping prices of technology
Increased connectivity &
tech knowledge of more & more of our students
Tech support clustered in one
area
Broader community of learners
around tech (leverage more)
Potential explosion of hybrid
classes (flexible classroom space scheduling)
Anticipate student future needs
Bond Election 2004
|
Internal
Lack of anticipated future funding
Obsolescence of HW & SW
infrastructure
Low pay scale for tech positions
Loss of District Support
External
Digital divide
Bond/Economy
Competition
Diminishing budget allocations
Vulnerability & security
issues of all systems
(i.e., hackers)
|