Close window to return to previous page. |
| 40th Annual CRLA Conference - Portland,
Oregon - Oct. 31-Nov. 3, 2007
|
| 1 Hour Pre-Conference Institute |
|
Presentation
Title:
Finding Common Ground: Peer Educators and the Gibbs Communication
Model
Presentation
Description:
This presentation will focus on the Gibbs Communication Model,
which emphasizes supportive rather than prescriptive-based communication,
and will discuss how that model is a useful training strategy
for peer educators. Learning Assistance administrators and Peer
Education Specialists will come away with an understanding of
the theoretical model and strategies for implementing the Gibbs
model in training sessions.
|
|
|
Institute/Session Summary:
This presentation will focus on the Gibbs Communication Model, which
emphasizes supportive rather than prescriptive-based communication,
and will then discuss how that model is a useful training strategy.
Learning Assistance Administrators and Peer Education Specialists will
come away with an understanding of the theoretical model and strategies
for implementing the Gibbs model in training sessions.
The presentation will
- Introduce the model (10 minute Powerpoint)
- Discuss uses of the model in training peer educators (10 minute
Powerpoint)
- Demonstrate implementation of training strategies (30 minute small
group work)
- Report demonstration strategy back to large group (10 minutes)
I will first provide an overview of the Gibbs Communication Model,
focusing on how this model has been used in educational settings, especially
writing center work that emphasizes inquiry-based learning. The Gibbs
model as theorized by Diane Gibbs, presents six parameters that emphasize
supportive behaviors and communicative strategies over prescriptive
ones. The chart below lists the areas of discussion.
| Prescriptive |
Supportive |
| Evaluative |
Descriptive |
| Controlling |
Assisting |
| Manipulative |
Facilitative |
| Superior |
Equal |
| Certain |
Possible |
| Indifferent |
Engaged |
The presentation will briefly discuss each of these pairings and provide
examples of the kind of communication illustrated by the terms. For
example, in the first pairing, evaluative language, which often uses
the word “you,” creates a destructive paradigm in which
the receiver of the message (here it would be the student) can become
defensive. An example for a peer mentor might be “Look at your
midterm grades. You are not demonstrating good work habits and you need
to work more on your time management.” Instead, the Gibbs model
would advise the mentor to use more descriptive language. For example,
a mentor might revise the statement by saying, “Midterm grades
often reflect the work habits of students during the first half of the
class. Sometimes something as simple as completing a Time Management
Worksheet makes a huge difference during the next part of the semester.
How about we carve out some time to talk about this?” Here, the
Gibbs model helps the peer educator separate the student from the problem
to create the opportunity for constructive collaboration between the
peer leader and the student.
Having used this model for 15 years in my writing center training with
peer tutors, I understand the importance of coaching peer leaders in
their communication patterns to help create an atmosphere of inquiry-based
learning. Peer leaders create rapport by collaborating with students
to create a space for problem-solving, rather than by being directive
in their communicative patterns. In Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Paulo
Friere emphasizes “critical and liberating dialogue, which presupposes
action” as the catalyst for self-knowledge and independent learning
(47). Peer leaders must understand that they are working with students
not on them, and that this kind of rapport can only exist when their
language patterns reflect that collaborative attitude. Likewise [B]ell
[H]ooks explains that “just the physical experience of hearing,
of listening intently, to each particular voice strengthens our capacity
to learn together” (186).
Preparing peer educators to work effectively with students includes
taking a close look at language issues and communicative strategies
that best facilitate collaborative learning. The Gibbs model demonstrates
one way to enact a theory of communication that helps peer educators
monitor their language patterns in a productive and useful way, one
that emphasizes the collaborative and egalitarian space through which
both students and their peer educators can learn and thrive.
Presenter1 Name: Diana Calhoun Bell
Presenter1 Institution: University of Alabama in Huntsville
Presenter1 Bio: Diana Calhoun Bell is the Director
of the Academic Resource Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Her research focuses on pedagogy and peer education. Her publications
include articles in the Writing Center Journal, Computers and Composition,
Readerly/Writerly Texts, Radical Pedagogy and the Writing Center Newsletter.
Her recent book, Deprivatized Pedagogy, is published through
Hampton Press.
|